Skip to content

Philosophy

Listening to the Business — 20 Years Later

In The Data Warehouse Toolkit, Ralph Kimball closes the book with a reminder that remains timeless:

“The gold coin for the data warehouse professional is to listen to the business.
After all, our job is to publish the right data.”

More than twenty years have passed.

Technology has changed.
Architectures have evolved.
Lakehouses replaced traditional warehouses.
Cloud platforms accelerated everything.
Organizational complexity increased.

But the objective did not change.

Our job is still to publish the right data.


The Modern Tension

Today, data teams operate under constant pressure:

  • faster delivery cycles
  • multiple data providers
  • cross-domain transformations
  • high expectations for traceability and governance

In this environment, documentation and architectural standards often become one of two extremes:

  1. Over-engineered and disconnected from execution, slowing delivery.
  2. Ignored in favor of speed, creating opaque and ungovernable environments.

Both paths lead away from publishing the right data.

Speed without structure creates chaos.
Structure without execution creates bureaucracy.


Documentation as a Means, Not an End

Ingestia was born from a simple conviction:

Documentation should not be the final artifact of a project.
It should be a parameter of execution.

Architectural standards, naming conventions, integrity rules, and lifecycle definitions must not live in:

  • static PDFs
  • isolated wikis
  • individual developer knowledge
  • hidden notebook logic

They must be executable.

When documentation becomes metadata, and metadata drives ingestion, governance stops being a bottleneck and becomes an enabler.


Transparency Over Tribal Knowledge

A data platform cannot depend on implicit knowledge.

The lifecycle of data must be explicit to the organization:

  • where data originated
  • how it was standardized
  • how it was transformed
  • which rules were enforced
  • which constraints were validated
  • what was rejected and why

This visibility cannot rely on the memory of a developer or the informal understanding of a key user.

It must be encoded, enforced, and reproducible.


Evolving the Discipline

Ingestia does not reject data warehousing discipline.
It evolves it.

The foundational idea remains the same: publish the right data.

What changes is how we operationalize that idea in a Lakehouse world:

  • through metadata-driven ingestion
  • through explicit layering strategies
  • through executable integrity rules
  • through standardized control columns
  • through deterministic execution patterns

The philosophy is not dogmatic.
It is pragmatic and continuously evolving.

Technology will keep changing.
Organizational pressures will keep increasing.

The horizon remains the same.

Our responsibility is still to publish the right data —
but now with transparency, reproducibility, and governance built into execution itself.